News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Hamas releases 24 hostages as Israel truce takes hold
Watchdog warns of potential New York MTA budget gaps
Top Wall Street analysts recommend these stocks for a long-term horizon
Price analysis 11/24: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, SOL, ADA, DOGE, TON, LINK, AVAX
‘Enjoy sub-$40K Bitcoin’ — PlanB stresses $100K average BTC price from 2024